This presentation introduces competency-based binary grading as a superior alternative that sidesteps all three problems. Built around four observable classroom behaviors — active listening, purposeful questioning, connecting current discussion to prior course material, and substantively contributing to peer dialogue — the rubric assigns points on a strict binary: the competency is either demonstrated or it is not. This presentation discusses pros and cons of CBBG from the pedagogical, assessment, and autonomy-building (student-centered) standpoints. Next, this presentation compares and contrasts alternative frameworks  — specifications grading, contract grading, and ungrading — as potential solutions. I engage audiences by using a comprehensive visual map, which can be used as a pedagogical cheat sheet. Yet each carries a critical vulnerability.

Presenters

• Vlad Kravtsov vkravtsov@shc.edu, Spring Hill College